AFRICOM deploys the USS Fort McHenry, offering partnerships to lost sovereignty
The USS Fort McHenry is on its way to the Gulf of Guinea to establish the continuing presence of Africom (Operation Recolonize?) It departed October 16. Or, as a headline in the African Oil Journal puts it:
USS Fort McHenry Navy Ship Left for Gulf of Guinea to protect Oil Interests:
The Gulf of Guinea has significant strategic importance because a large percentage of U.S. oil imports flow through it and U.S. officials are concerned about organized crime, and potentially terrorism, in the region.
. . ."It provides a good example of what the newly established U.S. Africa Command is about as it relates to helping our partner nations on the continent of Africa build their capacity to better govern their spaces, to have more effect in providing for the security of their people, as well as doing the things that are important in assuring the development of the continent in ways that promote increased globalization of their economies as well as the development of their societies for the betterment of their people," said the general.
General Ward says Africa Command will do the same type of training and humanitarian assistance missions the U.S. military has pursued in Africa for years, but will do more and will have better coordination with other U.S. government agencies, humanitarian groups and African governments.
He says such missions should help dispel concerns expressed in many African countries about alleged plans establish U.S. bases on the continent and to 'militarize' U.S. Africa policy.
"Once the command begins to operate, they will see that this hype of establishing large bases is just not a reality," said General Ward.
. . .
The commander of U.S. Navy forces in Europe, who is responsible for the Africa Partnership Station mission, says even with Africa Command not yet fully operational, the navy is moving from what he called 'episodic' involvement on the continent to a nearly constant presence, in response to requests from African countries.
At Moon of Alabama b real has some particularly cogent reporting and analysis on the launch of AFRICOM and the USS Fort McHenry. I recommend you go there and take a look.
The goal of AFRICOM is to guard US oil interests, as the headline so clearly states. The proffered partnerships are to train African militaries to do the jobs the US wants done. This process is already well underway. As Vijay Prashad points out, African armies have increasingly become praetorian guards to protect the interests of large corporations. These "partnerships" AFRICOM touts are intended to be part of that "nearly constant presence". In the article quoted above, General Ward brushes off the idea of large bases. The US will maintain a number of floating bases. Although I suspect it is still looking for a land base. The US may not need a land base to accomplish its objectives if it can manipulate its "partners" to its satisfaction.
When we hear talk of military partnerships, we should remember the ongoing US & Latin America military partnership, the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC) formerly the School of the Americas (SOA) and still based in Ft. Benning Georgia. It has been a military coup factory for Latin America.
SOA has trained more than 60,000 Latin American soldiers and policemen. Among its graduates are many of the continent's most notorious torturers, mass murderers, dictators and state terrorists. As hundreds of pages of documentation compiled by the pressure group SOA Watch show, Latin America has been ripped apart by its alumni.
In fact, this year, August 2007, SOA Watch tells us:
A recent criminal investigation into the Colombian Army’s Third Brigade, has prompted the arrest of thirteen high ranking officers accused of providing security and mobilizing troops for Diego Montoya (alias “Don Diego”), the leader of the Norte del Valle Cartel and one of the FBI’s 10 most-wanted criminals.
Two former instructors of the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (SOA/WHINSEC) are among the thirteen.
. . .
Over HALF of the thirteen military officials implicated in the drug cartel protection ring attended the U.S. Army School of the Americas and/or its successor institute, the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation.
Africa has already experienced more than its share of military coups. Coups stop progress and development dead in their tracks. We don't need more. There are already unfortunate ties between Latin American drug cartels and West Africa. Do we want the US military facilitating these ties, with African officers making contacts for the drug trade as part of their training? The US has been a complete failure in its war on drugs. There is NO reason to think it will do better in Africa, a continent about which it knows almost nothing.
The reference to increased globalization is likewise chilling. I see globalization and I think evisceration. The phrasing sounds like they are planning to open up Africa and pry out what they think are the good bits. It tells Africans that yet again they will be subsidizing the developed world with both blood and treasure.
Labels: Africa command, Africom, drugs, Gulf of Guinea, oil, recolonize



2 Comments:
welcome back, cc
(your "Will Ghana support recolonization by US AFRICOM?" post was excellent, btw)
re your mention of ward's hedging on basing in the DoD briefing, i saw the following recently in an NPR story
New U.S. Command in Africa Faces Skeptics
...
Contributing to the confusion is a debate raging between the Army and the Navy over what AFRICOM should be.
According to a well-placed Pentagon source involved in the issue, the Army wants to build an AFRICOM headquarters somewhere on the continent. The Navy wants AFRICOM to be a sea-based command — operating out of carriers and large vessels moored off the coast of Africa.
that's the only mention i've seen so far of a conflict b/w departments, though the idea of keeping the HQ at sea is not new. i expect, though, that there will be internal competition amongst the different military depts, as one of the links that i posted in the MoA thread has admiral ulrich pushing for more naval attaches on the continent. scope creep & all that stuff that comes w/ bureaucratic bloat. navy is to play big in AFRICOM, but i've also seen a lot of air force interest/zeal which seem an ominous omen. for instance, this trail i followed on the new joint cargo aircraft here.
re your mention of colombia, the u.s., and the "war on drugs", here are a couple links that spell out something ugly.
the bush admin places -- surprise surprise -- profits over people (and tries to scare congress into doing it)
US Official Urges Passage of Trade Deal
NEW YORK (AP) — The Bush administration warned Monday that failure by Congress to adopt a free trade agreement with Colombia would bolster the anti-American campaign of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.
Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns said that refusal by lawmakers to pass the agreement "will embolden someone like Hugo Chavez to think that he can make hay out of that crisis, and it will be a crisis if the free trade agreement does not pass."
...
Approval of the agreement with Colombia hinges on Democratic complaints that the government of President Alvaro Uribe is not doing enough to prevent the killing of labor leaders trying to organize unions and to punish officials linked to right-wing paramilitary organizations.
Burns called the agreement a "fundamental base of our relations in Latin America," and said that human rights issues should not stand in the way of cooperation between the countries.
"We understand that this is a major challenge for Colombia, the challenge of human rights," said Burns. "But the question is, because there are human rights problems in Colombia, does that mean that you turn away from the government?"
also,
national security archive: U.S. INTELLIGENCE LISTED COLOMBIAN PRESIDENT URIBE AMONG
"IMPORTANT COLOMBIAN NARCO-TRAFFICKERS" IN 1991
Washington, D.C., 1 August 2004 - Then-Senator and now President Álvaro Uribe Vélez of Colombia was a "close personal friend of Pablo Escobar" who was "dedicated to collaboration with the Medellín [drug] cartel at high government levels," according to a 1991 intelligence report from U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) officials in Colombia. The document was posted today on the website of the National Security Archive, a non-governmental research group based at George Washington University.
...
The newly-declassified report, dated 23 September 1991, is a numbered list of "the more important Colombian narco-traffickers contracted by the Colombian narcotic cartels for security, transportation, distribution, collection and enforcement of narcotics operations." The document was released by DIA in May 2004 in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the Archive in August 2000.
i'm currently reading piero gleijeses' excellent book conflicting missions: havana, washington, and africa, 1959-1976 and was just covering how kennedy's policy (as was that of his followers) chose having a base in the azores over self-determination in africa, plying portugal w/ cash, arms, and equipment despite knowing that it was being used to keep the colonies under control.
trade & bases over people. and so it goes...
By
Anonymous, at 12:58 AM, October 24, 2007
b real, Thank you re the recolonize article.
I heard the NPR story, but I guess I was sleepy, because I missed the clue about the "debate" between the army and navy. I too have heard the air force is very much interested.
The news you share about Columbia is not exactly surprising, and the opposite of encouraging. I didn't know about Uribe, and it is hardly good news. Although the trade deal is getting more opposition than I expected, I expect it will go through.
There was a story today at GhanaWeb about the cocaine trade on the increase in Ghana.
Mr. Kwamena Bartels, Minister of the Interior on Wednesday bemoaned the rate at which massive quantities of drugs were being shipped into the country and said government would make the necessary amendments to PNDCL 236 to deal with the current trends. He said the situation was as a result of the increased efforts of Drug Enforcement Agencies in Europe and Latin America to rid their countries of the trade forcing drug cartels to seek alternative routes in Africa.
We really don't need the additional corruption this brings. And there are a lot of indications that Kufuor has both family members and cronies involved in the trade. The US and AFRICOM seem more likely to make the problem worse.
Over the summer there was this story Villagers Praise God for Cocaine, which is not exactly good news, but funny.
Many villagers along the West Coast of Ghana have been praising God for his abundant mercies over the last few weeks. By village standards, many of them have become rich as a result of the droppings of parcels of cocaine in the sea. Some of the parcels floated ashore and others were picked up by fishermen on expedition.
Initially, the villagers thought the parcels they had picked up were soap for scrubbing the bathroom and they used them for that purpose. They however complained that the soap they had found was not leathering. Madam Abena Fosu from Axim said; we thought the soap was spoilt and that was why the white people threw it away.
“The strange thing is that all those who used the soap to scrub their bathrooms got very drunk.” At Esiamah, a student on vacation confirmed the story.
He said; “it didn’t take long for us to realize that the parcels were not soap but some very valuable stuff. “People came from Accra and were offering ¢200,000 (GH¢20) to ¢300,000 (GH¢30) for a parcel. “The villagers were thrilled but as the days rolled on and the parcels were in short supply the people from Accra offered more money. “Now some of them pay as much as ¢70,000,000,00 (seventy million cedis) for one parcel.
Thanks for the mention of the piero gleijeses book. I looked it up and I think I can get ahold of it. I got a copy of The Darker Nations based on your remarks, I hadn't heard of it before, and found it fascinating. He writes well, and I remember lots of pieces of what he covered. I remember wondering vaguely at some point what happened to the non-aligned movement. Chances are I'll be referring to the book from time to time. I appreciate your recommendations. -CC
By
Crossed Crocodiles, at 11:41 PM, October 24, 2007
Post a Comment
<< Home